Ayodhya's Ram temple to be built in 3 yrs; to cost Rs 1100
Ayodhya News: Ayodhya Latest News and Headlines Today
Ayodhya News: Latest News, Photos and Videos on Ayodhya
Ayodhya: Latest News, Photos and Videos on Ayodhya - ABP Live
ayodhya news today in english
ayodhya news today in english - win
If you are looking for source of news, consider these.
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Anticipating the unintended ( arunisnowhere ) This newsletter is really a weekly public policy thought-letter. While excellent newsletters on specific themes within public policy already exist, this thought-letter is about frameworks, mental models, and key ideas that will hopefully help you think about any public policy problem in imaginative ways. It seeks to answer just one question: how do I think about a particular public policy problem/solution? Here.
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
Newlaundry ( rockykol ) They have a bunch of podcast and you should check them out. They have Daily dose for daily news and NL Hafta for weekly news and NL charcha in Hindi. You should check their reports and coverage as well. They are also also highlighting the brands which are sponsoring hate and fake news on TV.
The Quint ( winterpainter11 ) The Big Story discusses about the news which are making the headlines and dissect the story with the views of the expert. And, they have The Big Story in Hindi as well.
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post. Edit- Added Newslaundry, the Quint and Anticipating the unintended.
I have compiled a list of news sources worth subscribing in this time
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to connect to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
A list of news services worth subscribing to in this age
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to connect to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
If you are looking for source of news, consider these.
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to connect to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
A list of news sources to subscribe in these times
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to connect to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
It is at this point that it becomes apparent that neoliberalism has a strong common agenda with the other project discussed here – Hindutva. This is not in any sense to downplay the obvious differences and tensions between the two projects (most centrally around their conceptions of “freedom”). It also bears repeating that this does not imply that an alliance between the two was or is “inevitable.” Yet, as living political projects, shaped in a dialectical relationship with their social foundations, their common goals offer a space that can be exploited. It is from this perspective that we can understand the gradual growth of the alliance between Hindutva and neoliberalism that developed over the 1990s. How does such an alliance operate? A good starting point is to note discursive dynamics in the English media. As an ideological site largely internal to the ruling class, the English media is an ideal location for ruling class organic intellectuals to play out negotiations between ideological projects. By observing media discourse, we can then identify the degree to which political projects are finding shared ground. It is hence striking to note that over the last fifteen years, the English media has shifted to strongly emphasise the ideological resonances between neoliberalism, Hindutva and individualisation. This can be seen if, in a similar manner to the outline of Hindutva conceptions made above, we also outline the conceptions of neoliberalism on these issues:
Reduction of social processes to individual choice: In neoliberal ideology, all action in all social spheres is built around “utility-maximising” individuals. Despite being portrayed as a descriptive concept, this is in fact a normative one. The ‘failure’ of individuals to behave as “rational” utility maximisers is attributed to “perverse incentives” from either state or society, which is condemned as both immoral and irrational. In this sense, the utility maximising individual is the equivalent of the “good Hindu” in Hindutva – both the centre of the social order and the ideal that that order aspires to produce.
The state exists as the expression and guarantor, not of individual or collective rights, but of a supreme principle: The place of Hindu rashtra is in this case taken by “the market”. The ideal state is the night watchman, the guarantor of the “market” – the only legitimate collective social activity. The state should ideally be the market’s guarantor against interference, nothing less and nothing more. In fact, it is particularly striking that one finds precisely the same phrase – “night watchman” – being used by the Sangh intellectual Dattopant Thengadi (1979) to describe the state.
Divisions within society are unnecessary and pathological; the only division that is of importance is the line between “society” and its Other. In neoliberalism, “civil society” – the social counterpart of the economic concept of the “market” – is the only legitimate social institution (a concept taken even further with the notion of “social capital”). As in Hindutva, classes, castes and other identities are fictions, with their roots in malign state interference and “political meddling.” In neoliberalism, the state itself takes the place of the “foreigner.” Welfare agencies, the bureaucracy, the legislature, political parties – all are ‘outside’ society and responsible for its “pathological” divisions. Political actors are socially illegitimate, and for both Hindutva and the neoliberals there is no worse crime than to “politicise” social issues.
Simply listing these principles already makes it apparent that they have become shrill themes in much English media coverage. Perhaps the best example is the reservations “debate.” Caste-based reservations are attacked on the ground that they violate the principles of individual “merit”, as per the first principle. Since the state’s role is to guarantee these principles and not interfere with them, the state is attacked for “meddling” with “meritocracy” rather than doing its job and providing infrastructure, education, etc. Finally, the reservations policy is attacked for “dividing” society along “caste lines” and its roots are seen as being “vote bank” politics. Yet, even though it would be totally contrary to neoliberal principles, much of the English media is happy to advocate economic reservations – which have long formed part of the individualised “social uplift” agenda preached by the Sangh Parivar, projecting reservations as charity rather than social justice. This inconsistency is a hallmark of the effort at finding shared ground. In an earlier paper, I have explored other examples of how these principles play out in operation. Moreover, the media is not only concerned with emphasising the common areas between the two agendas – it has also become a site for de-emphasising and reshaping those aspects that are not in harmony between the two projects. Thus, both in the view of the media and in reality, the Sangh Parivar has backpedaled on those of its issues that are not of interest to neoliberals: swadeshi, most of all, but also such issues as Akhand Bharat, Article 370, the universal civil code, etc. The Sangh’s earlier emphasis on “austerity” has also been quietly forgotten. The media in turn projects this as the gradual “moderation” of the Hindutva forces as they join the “mainstream.” Similar policy accommodations on the part of neoliberal ideologues are also visible on a close reading. Some of them include:
The continual and peculiar emphasis in Indian neoliberalism on “national self-confidence.” This is foreign to neoliberal ideology as such. Rather, it is a notion that clearly owes a great deal to Hindutva’s promotion of the concept of a “national self” that is weakened and sapped by its internal divisions. It is not an accident that exactly the same terminology – “awakening”, “newfound confidence”, “assertiveness” – that was used by the Sangh Parivar to describe the Ayodhya movement is now used by neoliberals to describe India post 1991.
The endorsement of economic reservations, as described above.
The attitude towards NRI’s, seen as a kind of “vanguard” of both projects. NRI’s are projected as ideal Indians, representatives of what ‘India’ could achieve if Indians were ‘good’ individuals following correct social ‘values’. There could hardly be any message that neoliberalism and Hindutva agree upon more.
An Institutional and Political Alliance These discursive adjustments form the face of a much deeper and growing relationship.(14) Such collaboration reached its most visible form at the national level during the NDA regime, when the Sangh Parivar and neoliberal ideologues cooperatively attempted to develop political praxis, institutional structures and hegemonic ideologies that allowed them to reap the advantages of a mutual alliance. Among these moves were the accelerated privatisation of education, intensified repression of social movements and the opening of the Indian economy to NRI-driven foreign investment. The two projects also promoted “anti-terrorism” as the single most important agenda of the Indian state, while attempting to dissolve its commitment to any forms of “social justice”. The 2004 election campaign, with its celebration of “India Shining”, was a particularly evocative reflection of this alliance – India was shining because it was “growing” both economically and in “self-confidence” as a Hindu nation. Meanwhile the Sangh Parivar, utilising its access to even enormous amounts of funds (significant amounts of which were either state or foreign-generated), institutionalised and formalised the “bargain” described above. The new pattern of expansion relied on the Sangh’s “seva” arms, which expanded enormously during the NDA regime. By the end of the NDA period, Vidya Bharati, the RSS educational organisation, was running – and still continues to run – the country’s largest private school network. Sangh Parivar outfits emerged as the largest “NGO’s” working in the tribal areas (Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and its allies). In Orissa and in Gujarat, cadre recruitment grew on a massive scale through “relief” operations in the wake of the 1999 cyclone and the 2001 earthquake respectively.(15) A key example of these new practices is the “ekal vidyalayas” in tribal areas, possibly the largest Sangh Parivar cadre recruitment activity today.(16) As per their website, there are 26,314 ekal vidyalayas in operation at the time of writing (17), but the actual number is likely to be far larger. In these schools, young tribal men and women are hired as acharyas (teachers), given brief ‘training’ and a curriculum, and asked to take regular classes for children out of school. In practice, neither the curriculum nor the training nor the student population is clear. There is no infrastructure other than irregular textbooks. Even where the acharya ceases to function, they at times carry on drawing their salary. As such, the schoolchildren do not seem to be the target of the scheme. Rather, the acharyas themselves appear to be the main goal. One obvious attraction is the stable salary (between Rs. 300 and Rs. 500). Second, the appeals in the training are mostly not concerned with overt Hindutva or even Hindu appeals. Instead, the focus is on social service, the need for gaon vikas, and the problems of “division” introduced by ‘politics’. The youth are forbidden to join any political party or any social movement of the area. The stress of the ekal vidyalaya progam is on apolitical social service – which in our society is a high status occupation. Thus the program offers a combination of material security through the salary, and of social mobility by earning respect of those with higher social stature while participating in a high status social occupation. But, once again, the “bargain” requires the acharya to choose individualisation and depoliticisation, except through their commitment to the Sangh. Thus, ekal vidyalayas and other Sangh ‘seva’ activities build a committed grassroots cadre for whom the “bargain” mentioned earlier is now given a formal, very concrete form: benefits to individuals who perform, and the fear of the loss of all such benefits and a return to being a ‘non-entity’ if one fails. Such a cadre in turn benefits Indian capital in general and neoliberalism in particular, in exchange for which funds are provided, media access guaranteed and state support (even under the UPA) more or less constant. The result is to make it easier to counter a 1980s’ style of politics, greatly weakening the capacity of petty commodity producers to resist the attack on their livelihoods. 2004 and After The experiment was partly cut short by the 2004 elections. However hegemonic the aspirations of the neoliberal-Hindutva alliance were, it had failed to achieve real hegemony in the electoral realm. But its successor, the UPA, has become a classic instance of a neoliberal regime that is not backed by an organised political force. It has pursued a schizophrenic political program, whose contradictions have offered space for some small popular gains along with an avalanche of neoliberal policies. It will also almost certainly become an example of how Indian neoliberalism, in the absence of a “totalitarian” party as its ally, devours the support base of its own regime. A sharp contrast to this situation is the 2007 Gujarat elections, where arguably the Sangh-neoliberal alliance has had its first major and resounding victory. Bankrolled by big capital, publicly proclaimed to be the saviour of both business and nation, the Sangh rode to power against a fragmented opposition speaking the language and raising the issues of the 1980s – caste divides, farmers’ suicides and tribal distress, in addition to tokenistic ‘secularism.’ The Gujarat verdict was built around two simultaneous phenomena. The first was the total dominance of capital, with state support, over both the working class and petty commodity producers, who are at the mercy of big capital in the State. The resulting insecurity and constant sense of threat was fed off of by the Sangh, whose “bargain” became ever-more attractive in this context. The result was the Sangh-driven organisational destruction of all other political formations, whose cadres were poached or coopted into Sangh formations (those who would not, or could not, were repressed or killed). In this context, there was no serious opposition; the Sangh has indeed effectively achieved hegemony, and the totalitarian party has reached fruition. This is not the only form these collaborations have taken. In Chhattisgarh, a different kind of collaboration has created Salwa Judum, a state supported militia formed by an unholy alliance between the security forces, the Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram (whose cadres are known to be closely involved) and corporate pressure for mineral extraction. Operating in the southern districts of Dantewada and Bijapur, the Salwa Judum has killed hundreds of adivasis and driven lakhs of people from their homes in the name of fighting the Maoists. The militia is mostly led by the elite among the adivasi communities of the area, those who are, in that sense, most commoditised and most accessible to the offers made by the state/Sangh/capital combine. Even as per official figures, more than 600 villages have been emptied of their population; their residents have either fled into the jungles or are trapped in horrific “relief camps” being run by the State government. There are credible allegations that at least part of the motivation for doing this is to ease the handing over of the land to mining corporations. Wiping out the Maoists, among the most dangerous defenders of petty commodity and subsistence production, is no doubt also a goal for Indian capital – and of course for the Sangh. Whereas Gujarat is India’s most capitalist state, Chhattisgarh is probably among the least. A truly hegemonic form of this alliance cannot take place here, for the degree of commoditisation is insufficient. Hence the balance within hegemony shifts towards force and away from consent, and the form it takes is that of direct, brutal violence – accumulation by dispossession in the most inhuman manner.
Conclusion and Implications for Left Praxis
Neither of these experiments is immediately replicable at the national level, but we do left politics a serious disservice if we therefore dismiss the danger. We have long allowed ourselves to be comforted with descriptions of the Indian right as peddlers of false notions, fraudulent demagogues building castles in the air around “Hindu rashtra” and “India Shining.” In particular, we have believed that Hindutva is primarily an exercise in identity-based chauvinism, a hate politics targeting minorities through propaganda and disinformation. We have seen our role in tackling this threat as primarily being one of awareness raising, enlightenment and education. The argument here has been that this interpretation of historical processes is incorrect. The Sangh in particular has achieved its incredible growth because it is a truly totalitarian party of the ruling class: responding to the needs of multiple social sectors, while presenting solutions to those needs in forms that correspond to the interests of the ruling classes. Fighting such projects cannot be limited to awareness raising alone. They must be confronted as organisations, to hinder and undermine their ability to offer the material-ideological ‘bargain’ that operates at their very foundation. When the UPA government falls in 2009, as it is almost certain to do, there will be another chance for neoliberal-Hindutva alliances to explore their full possibilities at the national level. The situation is ripe for such politics to blossom again. At this time, if we do not fight the Sangh on the political level, we not only hinder the battle for ‘secularism’, we provide Indian neoliberalism with an extremely powerful ally. One can even speculate that the one cannot be defeated without at least weakening the other. Paper by Shankar Gopalakrishnan
Fifty people who have affected Hindus and Hinduism in a negative way – Francois Gautier
In a recently posted article on François Gautier’s website, he lists the names of 50 people who can be described as enemies of Hindus and Hinduism. He says that he created the list, which is incomplete, without malice aforethought. Here is the list, 50 Biggest Enemies of Hindus (Dead or Alive), including the reasons he gives to justify his choice of enemies — Editor
Thomas Babington Macaulay – He played a significant role in introducing English and western concepts to education in India. This was worthy as no one can deny that English gives India an edge in dealing with other countries to penetrate into the era of globalization. Yet, Macaulay had very little regard for Hindu culture and education including all the books written in Sanskrit which actually contains all the historical information. Rather, the worthless abridgement used at preparatory schools in England is considered more valuable than books written in Sanskrit language. Today, much of India’s intellectuals and Media stand as a proof of the success of Macaulay as they look down on their own culture and analyse India through the western prism.
Indian National Congress – Only a few people know that the Indian National Congress was founded on 28 December 1885 by a Britisher, A.O. Hume. Its objectives were to “allow all those who work for the national (read British) good to meet each other personally, to discuss and decide of the political operations to start during the year”. And certainly, till the end of the 19th century, the Congress, who regarded British rule in India as a “divine dispensation”, was pleased with criticising moderately the Government, while endorsing its loyalty to the Crown and its faith in “liberalism” and “the British innate sense of justice”! The real nationalist leaders like Sri Aurobindo and Tilak, were put aside by the “moderate Congress”.
Jawaharlal Nehru – A French historian Alain Danielou writes, “Nehru was the perfect replica of a certain type of Englishman.” Several times he used the expression ‘continental people’, with an amused and sarcastic manner, to designate French or Italians. He reviled non-anglicised Indians and had a very shallow and partial knowledge of India. His ideal, the romantic socialism of 19th century Britain, was totally unfit to India, as the conditions of India were totally different from 19th century Europe. Nehru has been promoted by Congress as an icon, which nobody has yet dared to touch, but as history will show more and more, Nehru had done tremendous harm to India by initiating movements and patterns, which not only did vast damage in their times, but continue to survive and weigh down the Indian nation, long after their uselessness has been realized.
Babur – Jawaharlal Nehru wrote about Babur mentioning him as the destroyer of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The truth is that Babur indulged in unnecessary massacres and demolished thousands of temples showcasing himself as a ferocious Mughal emperor. His ultimate goal was probably the destruction and the enslaving of the Hindus. It is sad to see that Indian history books have no comments on such incidents.
Sonia Gandhi – It is true that Sonia brought discipline, order and consistency into the Congress party. But the amount of unrestrained power that she, a non-Indian, a simple elected MP like hundreds of others, possessed when the Congress was in power for ten years, should frighten us: a word, indeed a glance of her was sufficient to trigger action by her entourage, using any means—bearing in mind the case of P. Chidambaram when he would have allowed Narendra Modi to be killed by a Ishrat Jahan, a known terrorist. Thus, the instruments of power had never been so perverted in India. The CBI allegedly suppressed all orders against Quattrocchi and even allowed him to get away with billions of rupees which he had stolen from India. Yet, without blinking an eyelid, and with the Indian Media turning a blind eye, it went ruthlessly after Narendra Modi, the then chief minister of the most efficiently run state, the most corruption free.
The Pope – Christianity, unfortunately, is still clinging in the belief of a single true God, Jesus Christ, in spite of the feeble attempts at “Ecumenism” of the Church. It would be all right if the Church was playing by the rules of the free market, where there is a certain amount of fairness—“you see what advantages my religion is bringing you, compare it with your own and then feel free to choose”. But, sadly, the missionaries are using indirect and persuasive means to convert the poorest of the poor Hindus in India—offering free medical treatment, free schooling, interest-free loans, even going as far as organizing “fake miracle” prayer meetings, as it is regularly done by American preacher Benny Hinn. This is practiced in India, but they dare not do it in China, where freedom of religion is curtailed and any missionary caught persuading is kicked out. Would Hindus dare convert Christians in France, for instance? The confounding fact is that there is not a single Hindu temple in France, as their construction has not been allowed and there is even a minister in charge of hunting down “sects” (meaning what is not Christian-oriented).
Rahul Gandhi – No doubt Rahul Gandhi is a decent, well-meaning man, though totally ignorant of India’s culture and spirituality. But his ignorance becomes problematic as times. Bearing in mind the case of Wikileaks cables, where Rahul Gandhi tells the American ambassador that Hindu terrorism was more dangerous than Islamic terrorism—“The bigger threat may be the growth of radicalized Hindu groups, which create religious tensions and political confrontations with the Muslim community”. It looks like Rahul and his mother were trying to make an example of Colonel Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya to gratify their Muslim electorate by issuing direct orders to get a confession out of him and Sadhvi Pragya at any cost, even torture.
The Communist Party of India – Very few people know that the communists refused to collaborate against the Nazis during the 2nd World War, because Russia was then allied with Germany. Their attitude during the war with China in 1962 was also very uncertain. Most Marxists in India are anti-Hindu as a principle (Marx was against religion) and their intellectuals are expert at criticising Hindus. At a time when Marxism is deceased all over the world, including in Cuba and China, India is the last haven of communism. Though communists have certain sincerity (they generally are not corrupt and live a simple life, contrary to many Indian politicians) but they contribute very little to India’s growth, with their constant strikes and demands. Naxalism which is a great threat to this country is also a sprout of communism.
Priyanka Gandhi – We all can assume that in case Sonia Gandhi leaves India or something happens to her, Priyanka—and not Rahul—will be the natural choice of the Congress to take up the wheels. Would Priyanka bring a change in Congress? Unlikely. She will think like a Christian and a westerner, not like an Indian and adopt Nehru’s misplaced socialist and popular idea’s, which have landed India in corruption and red tape. Also, her husband Robert Vadra, a man who multiplied his wealth by 600 times in five years, is an albatross around her neck.
Barkha Dutt – Married twice to a Kashmiri Muslim, from a young journalist, Barkha turned into a Hindu basher (you just have to listen to the Radia tapes to understand that). The power that came with NDTV, as it grew into the most sophisticated TV news channel, and her proximity to the Congress party, also influenced her mind. There are also accusations of corruption against her and her boss Prannoy Roy.
Kancha Ilaiah – His hatred for Hindus can be seen in his immensely controversial book, Why I am not a Hindu, Kancha Ilaiah is a converted Christian who hates Hindus, particularly Brahmins whom he accuses of all the possible evils. He recently gave a statement on vegetarianism calling it as anti-nationalism, “For me, my nation starts with eating beef. Unfortunately, we gave up eating beef and our brains are not growing now. There is no enough protein,” Probably he doesn’t know that many westerners are now switching to vegetarianism.
Aamir Khan – Aamir Khan’s TV program on social issues, Satyamev Jayate, even raised his status to an activist for human rights. His comment on ‘Intolerance’, that his (Hindu) wife wanted to leave India, alienated him from many of his supporters. His anti-Hindu gurus film, like PK, also created a lot of hostility.
Shah Rukh Khan – As Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh is also married to a Hindu, but raises his kids as Muslims, and whenever it suits him plays the minority card (Pakistan invited him many times to settle there). In fact, playing a little anti-Hindu card pleases their Muslim fans and does no harm to their image, as Hindus anyway never retaliate.
Amartya Sen – He got the Nobel Prize, teaches in Oxford and is highly respected in the West but only few know that Amartya Sen rode his fame on the back of his false theories about poverty in India and in the West. Despite all that the Congress Government gave him the Nalanda University project for which he did nothing.
Rajdeep Sardesai – Rajdeep is not an honest journalist—witness the incident when he sat on a sting interview that showed the Congress paying bribes to BJP MLA’s to defect. He was also seen in his true light in New York, where he portrayed himself as a victim of a hard-line Hindu, whereas the video replays showed that in fact he was the aggressor. No doubt, Rajdeep is a personal enemy of Narendra Modi and has never veiled his dislike for the BJP.
Angana Chatterjee – Angana Chatterjee is a Hindu herself and started in an association named after India’s avatar, a great defender of Hindus, Sri Aurobindo. You need to know that she is married to Richard Shapiro who is Director and Associate Professor of the graduate anthropology program at California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS), also a very anti-Hindu body. In fact, Shapiro was barred from entering India in 2010. Angana and Richard are great defenders of the Kashmiri Muslims and attend every International Kashmir Freedom Conference (IKFC), which only gives the Muslim point of view and ignores the 450,000 Kashmiri Hindus who have become refugees in their own country.
Teesta Setalvad – Teesta is a Hindu herself, who like Barkha Dutt, is married to a Muslim, Javed Anand. Javed Anand is General Secretary of Muslims for Secular Democracy, a virulent anti-Hindu organization. Using her organization Teesta Setalvad’s name has come to symbolize everything that is wrong with NGO activism in India. She has used any means to go after Hindus, particularly their leaders and specially Mr Narenda Modi. Unfortunately, Teesta has been repeatedly exposed for having indulged in unethical acts and has cases pending against her in courts for perjury. She has taken the courts for a ride with her perjury and her acts of influencing witnesses. She has misused the lack of education and poverty of victims to file false affidavits to further her own agenda.
Aurangzeb – Aurangzeb harmed not only Hindus, but also to his own family: he beheaded his brother Dara Shikoh, who was the rightful heir to the throne, poisoned his own father, and imprisoned his son. Aurangzeb (1658-1707) did not just build an isolated mosque on a destroyed temple, he ordered all the temples to be destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishwanath, Krishna’s birth temple in Mathura, the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujurat, the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares and the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya. … His evil reign might end only after Shivaji Maharaj, a true Hindu hero brought him to his knees. Yet Shivaji is treated as a nobody in Indian history books and Aurangzeb like a harsh but just emperor.
John Dayal – The most virulent and articulate Christian anti-Hindu, John and many other Indian Christian leaders and bishops are not only practicing a Christianity which had its place 50 years ago in Europe (but is no more today, as Western Christianity is evolving), but are also re-embracing the old colonial missionary concept that Christ is the only ‘true’ God and that all ‘heathens’ Hindus have to be converted.
Irfan Habib – Irfan Habib has been side-lined by the Modi Government. He and Romila Thapar ruled supreme for nearly 40 years in devising Indian school curriculum. Together they have falsified Indian history with total impunity and went after the Hindus full steam. Irfan Habib continued the legacy of his father, Mohamed Habiib, to rewrite the chapter of Muslim invasions in India. Habib father and son’s books are based on four theories: 1) that the records (written by the Muslims themselves) of slaughters of Hindus, the enslaving of their women and children and razing of temples were “mere exaggerations by court poets and zealous chroniclers to please their rulers”. 2) That there were indeed atrocities, but mainly committed by Turks, the savage riders from the Steppe. 3) That the destruction of the temples took place because Hindus stored their gold and jewels inside them and therefore Muslim armies plundered these. 4) That the conversion of millions of Hindus to Islam was not forced, “but what happened was there was a shift of opinion in the population, who on its own free will chose the Shariat against the Hindu law (Smriti), as they were all oppressed by the bad Brahmins”!
Ramachandra Guha – Outlook magazine’s favourite columnist, who likes Rahul Gandhi, recently said that “Hindu fundamentalism is more threatening than Islamic terrorism”. Guha has written a number of books targeting Hindus and their spiritual leaders. Unfortunately, as many of these leftist intellectuals, he is fairly popular in the West and often quoted by western correspondents based in India.
Romila Thapar – The most well-known Indian historian, who has links with all Indologists in the world, universities and India centers, is a Hindu. As Rajiv Malhotra writes: “Hindu spiritual experiences are devalued by Romila Thapar, as pathological. She resorts to a quasi-scholarly speculation of racial hatred as existing in entire Indian traditions, demonizing the ‘other’, a technique to justify holding such people in contempt and even attacking them”. This is exactly the same thesis that is being spread today by Maoist insurgents working among remote tribes in central India, namely, that demons mentioned in Hinduism are actually references to tribal people. Today even, most of the intellectuals, journalists and many of India’s elite have been influenced by that school of thinking and regularly ape its theories.
N. Ram & The Hindu newspaper – Long time editor of the newspaper The Hindu, who should be renamed “The Anti-Hindu”. The magazine of The Hindu, Frontline, although well written as The Hindu, perpetuates a dead ideology. Unfortunately The Hindu is still read by many in India, including westerners in the South of India.
Sagarika Ghose & CNN-IBN – Rajdeep Sardesai’s wife shares her beliefs and hatred for the Hindus. It’s a tragedy that CNN-IBN is sympathetic to anybody who is anti-Hindu. CNN, a renowned western television station, choose to partner someone who is against the majority community of their country.
Mamata Banerjee – It is said that Mamata Banerjee is a Kali worshipper and does regular pujas when she is alone in her house. But the thrust of getting votes can transform anyone. She thus panders to Muslim community, turning a blind eye to the atrocities committed on the Hindus by the Bangladeshis refugees, who are given ration cards so that they can vote for Mamata. Also, she chose to say ‘Allah O Akbar’ when she just got re-elected despite of knowing the fact that Hindus are becoming minorities in certain districts of WB, Assam or UP. That is a tragedy and something should be done.
Akbaruddin Owaisi – Proof that India is a democracy lies in the fact that people like Owaisi and his brother can not only rant against the Hindus and preach near secession, but also get elected. There has to be some limits to preaching hatred and separatism.
Geelani & Other Kashmiri Separatists – It is confounding to see that the Indian Government allow these separatists to openly visit the Pakistani embassy in Delhi or travel to Pakistan. No country tolerates that kind of open separatism, be it France with Corsica, or even England with the faraway Falkland Islands, which geographically belong to Argentina. Also, one cannot forget that the Muslims pushed out of the Valley of Kashmir 500.000 Hindus who had lived there for generations.
Zakir Naik – Zakir Naik tried to hurt religious sentiments of Hindus by denigrating Shri Ganesh; that too, during the Ganesh Festival. He gave Hindus a challenge, through the medium of Facebook and Youtube, to prove that Shri Ganapati is a Deity. He also made an anti-Hindu statement that “If your God is unable to recognise his own son, how will he know that I am in danger”. By making such comments Naik has hurt religious sentiments of billions of Hindus. It has also created rage among members of Shiv Sena, BJP and various pro-Hindu organisations, Ganeshotsava Mandals and devout Hindus. Naik also went after Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in the famous debate.
Christophe Jaffrelot – This most famous French Indologist, paid by the French Government, is most responsible for the bad image of the BJP in France. He wrote many offensive books on ‘Hindu fundamentalism’. He is feted by the press corps and gets all kind of laudatory reviews when he comes to Indian to release the English translations of his books. So much for secularism in India—Jaffrelot, Sanjay Subramanyam (who teaches in the prestigious College de France), and others in France—keep harping on India’s problems—castes, poverty, so-called Hindu fundamentalism, etc. I know for a fact that in France, it has an influence on the top bureaucrats and the politicians, as every time something important happens in India—elections, catastrophes, riots, etc, their slanted opinions are hunted by newspapers, radios and televisions.
NGO’s – NGO’s in India are most of the time anti-Hindus. 70% of them work on “woman empowerment”, or “uplifting” the villagers in tribal areas, which is good, but should be done in a neutral manner with friendliness to the Indian Government. It is nowadays fashionable in India to always highlight the downtrodden condition of Indian women and their underprivileged place in Indian society. But no country in the world has granted such an important place to women in its spirituality and social ethos. And even today, behind all appearances—arranged marriages, submission to men, preference of male children in some rural areas (but girls are loved in India like nowhere in the world)—it can be safely said that very often, from the poorest to the richest classes, women control—even if behind the scenes—a lot of the family affairs: the education of their children (men in India are often “mama’s boys”), monetary concerns, and husbands often refer to them for important decisions. Countries such as France or the United States, who are often preaching to India on “women’s rights” never had a woman as their top leader, whereas India had Indira Gandhi ruling with an iron hand for nearly twenty years; and proportionately they have less MP’s than India, which is considering earmarking 33% of seats in Parliament for women, a revolution in human history! But this obsession of NGO’s with women and village empowerment (usually they take one village and make it like a showcase, for the benefit of visiting donors from abroad) has completely eclipsed the burning issue that would require NGO’s attention with the tremendous amount of funds they attract from abroad: afforestation, as there are hardly any forest worth the name left today in India.
Karunanidhi – Karunanidhi and before him his mentor, Anna, exploited to the hilt the Dravidian theory. According to this theory, which was actually devised in the 18th and 19th century by British linguists and archaeologists, who had a vested interest to prove the supremacy of their culture over the one of the subcontinent, the first inhabitants of India were good-natured, peaceful, dark-skinned shepherds, called the Dravidians. Then, around 1500 B.C., India is said to have been invaded by tribes called the Aryans: white-skinned, nomadic people, who originated somewhere in Urals, or the Caucasus. To the Aryans are attributed Sanskrit the Vedic or Hindu religion, India’s greatest spiritual texts, the Vedas, as well as a host of subsequent writings, the Upanishads, the Mahabharata, the Ramanaya, etc. And thus English missionaries and, later, American preachers were able to convert tribes and low caste Hindus by telling them: “you, the aborigines, the tribals, the Harijans, were there in India before the Aryans; you are the original inhabitants of India, and you should discard Hinduism, the religion of these arrogant Aryans and embrace Christianity, the true religion”. Karunanidhi also exploits this theory and he and Anna have made life for Tamil Brahmins so miserable that many left Tamil Nadu for Delhi or even the US.
Wendy Doniger – This American Hindu hater, supposedly a historian, says that Rama thinks that sex is putting him in political danger (keeping his allegedly unchaste wife will make the people revolt), but in fact he has it backward: Politics is driving Rama to make a sexual and religious mistake; public concerns make him banish the wife he loves. Rama banishes Sita as Dasharatha has banished Rama. Significantly, the moment when Rama kicks Sita out for the second time comes directly after a long passage in which Rama makes love to Sita passionately, drinking wine with her, for many days on end; the banishment comes as a direct reaction against the sensual indulgence. Her latest book, The Hindus: An Alternative History was written with an intent to mock Hinduism.
Akbar – Akbar is one of the goody-goodies in Indian history books, like Ashoka because he was a Buddhist, that Marxist historians like to glorify. No doubt, Akbar was one of the better Mughal emperors, but few people know that when he captured Chittor on February 25, 1568, he ordered that the thirty thousand civil population be butchered, including women and children who had taken shelter in the fort. Destruction of temples also took place on mass scale in Akbar’s reign and it is even said that he ordered that a mountain be made of the tufts of the Brahmins’ hairs.
Michael Witzel – He is a professor of Sanskrit at Harvard, who recently tried to prevent the removal of references to India and Hinduism in the curriculum followed by schools in California which parents of Indian origin found to be inadequate, inaccurate or just outright insensitive. Known for aggressively pushing theories forged by Left historians of the Romila Thapar genre that have been long discredited through scientific means, including DNA studies, this ‘linguist’ is known for promoting himself as a ‘historian’ in academic circles. His proximity to Left historians in India is no secret. On one occasion, he even said, “Hindus in the US are lost or abandoned people”.
Amnesty International – Amnesty International, which has a large number of Pakistanis in its staff, has always been hostile to Hindus. I remember showing an exhibition on Kashmir in London at the prestigious Commonwealth Club. The South Asia Amnesty in-charge refused to come and see it—although the club was just a stone throw away from Amnesty’s London office. What did the Kashmiri Hindus do that Amnesty considers them untouchable? And how come that the Muslims of the Valley who chased them by terror and made them flee their ancestral lands and homes are not condemned by Amnesty? It triggers a lot of questions about Amnesty’s impartiality.
Prannoy Roy (CEO of NDTV) – No doubt, Prannoy Roy created one of the best TV channels in India in terms of content and professional quality, but from the beginning NDTV’s slant was anti-Hindu. Why? Did you know that Prannoy is married to Radhika Roy, who is the sister of Brinda Karat, one of the leading lights of the Communist Party of India Marxist (CPI(M))? The sad thing is that many BJP leaders always run to NDTV, to be crucified by Barkha Dutt, Pranno’s second in command today.
P. Chidambaram – There are many questions asked today about the role of P. Chidambaram when he was in power during the ten years of the Congress. As finance minister, he went after Hindus by clamping down on Hindu institutions that had the 100% yoga tax rebate; as home minister his role is even more dubious: he had cleared an affidavit in 2009 which described college student Ishrat Jahan as a Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist involved in a plot to assassinate then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. About a month later, a second affidavit was filed in court in which all references to Ishrat’s alleged terror links were missing.
Sitaram Yechury – Yechury is an intelligent man and a brilliant speaker but he went full steam against Mr Modi’s declaration of June 21 as International Yoga Day, which was supported by the UN General Assembly and which should not cause any problem, as yoga is a universal technique that is practiced all over the world by millions of Christians. Oh, but the hitch is that yoga is a Hindu invention, hence Mr Yechury’s hostility, who famously said: “under this BJP government’s aggressive global campaigns, India appears to be seeking a global positioning not on the basis of its internal strength, economic or otherwise, but on the basis of such ‘accomplishments’ as having the UN General Assembly declare International Yoga Day on June 21”. The fact that a senior communist leader in India fails to see the potential to leverage the acceptance and spread of yoga across the world as a means to further India’s global influence and power is a testament to the monumental intellectual bankruptcy afflicting the communists in India.
Mother Teresa – Mother Teresa is still the fallacy for India. No doubt, she did saintly work. But was caring for the dying and orphaned children her only goal? The truth is that she stood for the most orthodox Christian conservatism. There is no doubt that Mother Teresa also had a goal to convert Hindus to Christianity, the only true religion in her eyes.
Karan Thapar– Karan Thapar, who owns ITV, which unfortunately produces shows for BBC, is one of the most famous faces of journalism in India. Karan Thapar’s father was General Pran Nath Thapar COAS during 1962 war, and his aunt is Romila Thapar. Does that explain why Karan, though a decent man, is known for his anti-Hindu bias? Once he invited me on a program about the painter M. F. Husain, who as you know has depicted Hindus’ most revered Gods fornicating or even sodomizing each other. I had brought on the show photocopies of these paintings, a solid evidence of Husain’s hatred of Hinduism, but Karan refused that I showed them on camera. So much for ITV’s journalistic impartiality.
Javed Akhtar – Though Javed Akhtar came out recently against those who opposed saying “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, he is also known as a Hindu baiter. I remember him going full steam against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Hindu gurus in an India Today symposium a few years ago. Akhtar also repeatedly equated the Gujarat 2002 anti-Muslim riots to the Jewish holocaust. As one of his detractors said: “it is impossible to believe that Akhtar isn’t aware of the horrors at Auschwitz or Sobibor to compare them with rioting in Gujarat”.
Shabana Azmi – Akhtar’s second wife, Shabana Azmi is a fine actress. Nevertheless she is also a Hindu baiter. When she was invited to the international film festival of Deauville in France, I read the numerous interviews where she kept harping about “Hindu fundamentalists”, and repeatedly lambasted the “right wing” BJP Government and accused them of turning a “blind eye” to the attacks towards India’s minorities, while portraying herself as a courageous social activist fighting for freedom of expression. She also only spoke en passant about Muslim fundamentalism. Again the old trick to either equate Muslim and Hindu fundamentalism, or even in the case of Azmi, Rahul Gandhi and others, to say that Hindu fundamentalism is more dangerous than the Islamic one.
Aakar Patel – Aakar Patel, a subtle but redoubtable Hindu hater, is sadly the head of Amnesty International India (one can see there the perversion of Amnesty, to name a Muslim as its head in a country inhabited by 80% Hindus). Aakar indeed always rants against Narendra Modi and the Hindu majority, saying: “one must be neutral.” But “we dissent against our own country, because dissent is patriotic”. However he adds: “Anyone opposing us (Amnesty International?, is morally deficient and a repugnant human being”. Aakar Patel’s hatred for the majority community is not veiled. He wrote, “Most extremists in India are not Muslims, they are Hindu Maoists”.
Arundhati Roy – Cousin of Prannoy Roy, she was married to Gerard da Cunha first and then to filmmaker Pradip Krishen. Apart from her first book The God of Small Things, Arundhati never wrote again anything of value. She is most happy in the company of Maoists, Naxalites, Tamil Elam [LTTE], and Kashmiri separatists. Roy famously said, “Kashmir has never been an integral part of India and the Indian Government is at war with Maoists to aid the MNCs”. She also says that Modi is promoting Brahmanism. After the “intolerance” debate, she returned her national award for screenplay.
Father Cedric Prakash – This Indian Christian priest has been most active in betraying his own country in the US, amongst Congress parliamentary committees. In June 2002, he testified before the US Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) in Washington, about the lack of religious freedom in India. His is a clear case of an Indian citizen asking an alien nation intervene in India’s domestic affairs. Fr. Prakash has been a vocal critic of Narendra Modi, often in collaboration with John Dayal and Teesta Setalvad.
Martha Nussbaum – Her pronouncement: “perpetrators of violence are not Muslims but Hindus”, is proof enough of Nussbaum’s hatred. Her interest in India started while working for Amartya Sen, with whom she shared an intimate relationship, a fact she herself bragged about. Before the 2014 parliament elections, Amartya Sen had said that he wouldn’t like Modi to be the PM of India. Martha does not have any qualification or training in archaeology, Sanskrit, geology,or metallurgy, yet writes with authority about the dating of the Vedas.
Hillary Clinton – Hillary Clinton has no great love for India and often leans towards Pakistan (her vice chairman of the 2016 election campaign is Huma Mahmood Abedin, of Pakistani origin). Maybe the numerous infidelities of her husband Bill made her into a hard and cynical woman, but if she becomes president of the US, she will be no friend of India and Hindus. Her attitude towards Islam and Muslim fundamentalism is also ambiguous and she is probably closer to Obama’s views, than any other presidential candidate. You can expect continuing support, financial and in armaments to Pakistan if she is elected.
Medha Patkar – Another NGO, who very selectively targets only Hindus. Her Narmada dam agitation had one target only—Narendra Modi. Yet the dam has proved to be the biggest factor to Gujarat’s prosperity, bringing electricity, water, prosperity to all, Hindus as well as Muslims. Medha was also involved in many movements that blocked Mr Modi’s visas in the UK and the US and that tried to stop him from becoming prime minister.
Mahatma Gandhi? – I put it with a question mark, as I consider him as a great soul indeed. But there are many who point out that he never seemed to have realised the great danger that Nazism represented for humanity. Calling Hitler “my beloved brother”, a man who murdered 6 million Jews in cold-blood just to prove the purity of his own race, is more than just innocence, it borders on criminal credulity. And did not Gandhi also advise the Jews to let themselves be butchered? His not condemning Muslims during the Khilafat Movement when thousands of Hindus were butchered by Indian Muslims, or his indulgence of Jinnah, going as far as proposing to make him the prime minister of India, have not always earned him Hindu goodwill. ¶ Gandhi’s love of the Harijans, as he called them, was certainly very touching and sprang from the highest motivations, but once more Gandhi took the European element in the decrying of the caste system, sowing the seeds of future disorders and of a caste war in India, of which we see the effects only today.
Hindus Themselves – Hindus, it must be said, are their own biggest enemies. They must be some of the most selfish and individualistic people in the world: rich Hindus never help their poorer brothers and sisters—that’s’ why the Mother Teresas and Sonia Gandhis are able to flourish in India. A Hindu abroad never acknowledges another Hindu, but pretends he or she does not exist. You can insult Hindus and their Gods and Goddesses as much as you want and nothing will happen to you. A billion Hindus have not raised a finger about the 450.000 Kashmiri Pandits who became refugees in their own country after they were chased out by terror from the Valley of Kashmir in the 90’s. Hindus today don’t give a damn whether their children know about the Ramayana, the Mahabharata or the Bhagavad Gita, where every truth that needs to be known about life, after life, karma, dharma and soul is taught. Modern Hindu children do not go to temples, pray or know what a puja is. Hindus do not care to have colleges where Hindu values are imparted, like the Muslims have (Aligarh University for instance) The only one ever, the Benares Hindu University, should not be called ‘Hindu’, as nothing Hindu is taught there anymore.
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, who along with a few hundred men, stood his ground against the most powerful emperor of his times, has practically no place in Indian history books and is often described as a petty chieftain or even a plunderer. So is Maharana Pratap, the only Rajput who fought against the Mughals and actually defeated Akbar in Haldighati. Hindus tend to merge and melt wherever they live—and in the process, lose some of their identities and togetherness. And finally the most deadly and vicious intellectuals that we have reviewed above, are Hindus most of them. They are the ones that should be targeted, in a non-violent but firm manner. – Francois Gautier, 13 June 2016. The list has been edited by a staff writer at Newsgram and again by the editor of Bharata Bharati. See the original here.
to whomsoever it may concern... no pills here, just facts with sources. lets start with * Nizamuddin markaz case March 13: 3400 people gather at the Nizamuddin markaz as part of a religious gathering. March 16: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal announces that no religious, social, political gatherings of more than 50 people are allowed in Delhi till March 31. People at the Nizamuddin Markaz still continue to stay put. March 20: 10 Indonesians who attended the gathering in Delhi test positive in Telangana. March 22: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Janta Curfew is observed across nation. No public gatherings were allowed for a day. March 23: 1500 people vacate the Markaz. March 24: PM Modi announces nationwide lockdown for 21 days. No public gatherings, any kind of non-essential movement outside residences allowed. Only essential services allowed to remain functional. March 24: Nizamuddin Police asks remaining people at the Markaz to vacate the area. March 25: Around 1000 people are still residing in the area defying lockdown orders. A medical team visits the Markaz and suspected cases are isolated in a hall within the building. Jamaat officials go to the SDM's office. File an application for permission to vacate. Vehicles list was also given to seek passes. March 26: An Indian preacher who attended the gathering in Delhi is tested positive and dies in Srinagar. March 26: SDM visits the Markaz and calls the Jamaat officials for a meeting with the District Magistrate. March 27: Six coronavirus suspects are taken away from the Markaz for medical checkup and are later put in a quarantine facility in Jhajjar, Haryana. March 28: A World Health Organisation (WHO) team along with the SDM visit the Markaz. 33 people who were taken for medical checkup are isolated at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Hospital in Delhi. March 28: ACP, Lajpat Nagar, sends a notice to the Markaz to vacate immediately. March 29: Markaz officials respond to the ACP's letter saying no new people were allowed to gather post the nationwide lockdown announcement. The current gathering had started much before the lockdown and that the PM in his lockdown speech said jo jahaan hai, vahin rahe (stay put wherever you are). 29 March night: Police and health authorities start taking out people from the Markaz and send them to hospitals and quarantine facilities. Delhi Police has claimed that they sent two notices to the mosque committee but they still didn't mend their ways. Notices were sent on March 23 and March 28. source https://i.redd.it/84a1flwrk6q41.jpg ‘May Wipe Off Tribes’: Coronavirus Spread From Delhi’s Nizamuddin Congregation Threatens Andaman Islands’ Aborigines ‘If 70,000 angels cannot save you, how can a doctor?’ preached the Maulana of Markaz, Nizamuddin amidst Coronavirus outbreak Tablighi Jamaat shares links with terror outfits 'Al-Qaeda' operatives used the Tablighi Jamaat’s headquarters at Nizamuddin https://www.opindia.com/2020/04/tablighi-jamaat-coronavirus-quarantine-tantrum-abuse-official-spit-docto https://www.patrika.com/miscellenous-india/tableeghi-jamat-people-cross-limits-spitting-on-doctor-in-delhi-5957769/
Tablighi Jamaat Patients Make Obscene Gestures, Roam Nude, Demand Bidi From Nurses: Ghaziabad CMS Tells Police
The 42nd Amendment changed the description of India from a "sovereign democratic republic" to a "sovereign, socialist secular democratic republic" The Constitution (Forty-second amendment) Act, 1976, was enacted during the Emergency (25 June 1975 – 21 March 1977)
so much for being a "democratic" country! LEBANON IS GONE and INDIA has something to learn from it. Lebanon – a glaring example of what can go wrong In the 1970’s, Lebanon was called 'Paradise' and its capital Beirut was the 'Paris of the East'. The Lebanese Christians are some of the oldest Christians in the world, preceded only by the oriental Orthodox of Armenia and Copts of Egypt. Lebanon was a progressive, tolerant and multi-cultural society, just like India is today. Lebanon had some of the best Universities in Middle East, where children from all over Arabia used to come to study. And then they used to stay there & work. Lebanese banking was one of the best banking systems in the world. Despite not having oil, Lebanon had a great economy. The Lebanese society’s progressiveness can be gauged from the 60s Hindi film "An Evening in Paris", which was also shot in Lebanon! The Islamic population of Lebanon was growing steadily and the Muslims were producing many more kids than the Christians and the kids were slowly being radicalised due to their lack of education!! In the 1970’s there was unrest in Jordan and liberal Lebanon was made to open its doors to "Palestinian refugees" by their Muslim leaders to show “True compassion”!!. However, by 1980, Lebanon was in exactly the same condition as Syria is in today!! Jihadists, who entered as "refugees", started ethnic cleansing of the native Christians resulting in untold number of deaths! No one came to save and people who couldn’t adjust to this violence, left Lebanon in waves and waves of emigration*. As a result of the deaths and emigrations, the Lebanese Christian population, which was 60% in 1970, whittled down to a mere 37% in 30 years! Today, there are more Lebanese people living outside of Lebanon than within and their right to return has been blocked by the Muslim majority through laws. The doors are now sealed shut! This sad story of Lebanon is only 30 years old! India needs to learn from Lebanese history. There is a need to be vigilant against the Crusaders like Rohingyas, Bangladesh intruders and also the Enemies within!! https://www.persecution.org/2019/04/07/christians-lebanon-maintain-crucial-presence/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReGKlnPGrJAhttps://intpolicydigest.org/2019/05/01/what-is-coming-for-christians-and-other-minorities-in-lebanon-and-the-levant/ https://nypost.com/2019/11/15/a-mass-christian-exodus-from-the-middle-east-would-be-a-catastrophe/ Have you noticed the Islamic conflicts around the world and how much hate Muslims have against Christians, Jews and other sects of Islam? What if I told you that Muslims hate Hindus more than anything else in the world. They hate Hindus even more than they hate Jews. In the mind of a Muslim the Jews, Christians and other Muslims sects still believe in "the one true Allah". However Hindus don't get that benefit. Muslims consider Hindus to be "mushrik" (polytheists, idol-worshippers etc). Christians, Jews and other sects of Islam are "kuffar". They will be tolerated under Muslim rule. However Hindus? We are "mushrik" and are allowed to be hunted and killed under Muslim rule. Remember Hinduism is the last major pagan civilization in the world. The majority of Muslims and a big minority of Christians hate that we are still standing strong. The killing of a group of people with the intention to wipe out the group is called genocide. A genocide carried out with the support of a ruling power is called holocaust. Holo + caust. The Islamic Invasion of India was a holocaust from the start till the death of Aurangzeb. It was a holocaust AND an attempt at cultural genocide, seeing how he was hell bent on wiping out Hinduism from his territories, personally ordering not only demolition of Temples but also construction of Mosques on top of them. Even if had not built fucking mosques on top, Hindus could have reclaimed the temples. But no. He was a Jihadi scumbag. And Islamic Invasion of India was a holocaust. Islamic Destruction of Hindu Temples
Name Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad Mein (India under Islamic Rule) Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai. About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history. Because of his scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the Darul Nadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama. He continued in that post till his death in February 1923. The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above mentioned book. Here we can see a brief description of few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples. a. Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi: "According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al-Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the Hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud-Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque..." b. The Mosque at Jaunpur: "This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiseled stones. Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid." c. The Mosque at Qanauj: "It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here. The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar." d. Jami Masjid at Etwah: "This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed. ." e. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya: "This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji... Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H.963 " f. Mosque at Benaras: "Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple. That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan." g. Mosque at Mathura: "Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura. This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite."
These are examples from just one book. There are 21 such books mentioned here here is something from your (to whomsoever it may concern) beloved Akbar the great Allah Upanishad, or Allopanishad, is a book of dubious origin believed to be written during Muslim rule in India during 15th to 16th Century in the time of Mughal Emperor Akbar's reign Allopanishad, Written Under The Patronage Of Akbar, Is Not A Genuine Upanishad What is "Allopanishad"? Is it accepted by Hindus? Akbar ordered a converted Brahmin to write Allopanishad. This book was then fraudulently inserted in genuine copies of Atharva Veda. One verse of Allopanishad reads-"Allo Rasula Mahamad Akbarasya allam" Until early 20th century, many Atharvaveda manuscripts had Allopanishad Historian Professor K.S. Lal estimates that the Hindu population in India decreased by 80 million between 1000 AD and 1525 AD, an extermination unparalleled in World history. Mahmud of Ghazni: “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.” Khilji: “Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.” Taimur: “On the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty." Babur: ”In AH 934 (1538 C.E.) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours. We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been Daru’l-Harb (nation of non-muslims) for years was made into a Daru’l-Islam (a muslim nation).” Babur in Baburnama: “For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer, I battled infidels and Hindus, I determined to become a martyr Thank God I became a Killer of Non-Muslims!” Shahjahan’s record in Badshah Nama, Qazinivi & Badshah Nama, Lahori: “The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of converts….Most of the women (to save their honour) burnt themselves to death. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars (Noblemen)” ‘Tarikh-I-Alamgiri’: “Abdali’s soldiers would be paid 5 Rupees for every enemy head brought in. Every horseman had loaded up all his horses with the plundered property, and atop of it rode the girl-captives and the slaves. The severed heads were tied up in rugs like bundles of grain and placed on the heads of the captives…Then the heads were stuck upon lances and taken to the gate of the chief minister for payment.” TBH i dont have any problem with anyone until they start interfering with my life. they can simply live as they want at their place. just dont push that on me. We gave them 2 nations which were partitioned just on the basis of religion. so why is it our onus to please them all the time?? google out religion specific laws of India and you will find out that its only Hindu temples which are being taxed. why this step motherly behavior with the biggest community of country?? they call Hindu barbarians for demolishing babri conveniently forgetting that the very prophet who started their religion started by doing the very same thing in Kaba. mosque is just a place of worship and even Saudi Arabia has demolished some of the most prominent mosques to build public infra. But ayodhya is one of the holiest sites for Hindus almost equal to what mecca is to Muslims. then why couldnt they show big heart for their Hindu brethren and give that place to them. after all the whole site is even smaller then a hectare. they cry foul on changing the name of Allahbad to Prayagraj conveniently ignoring the fact that it was changed from Prayagraj to Allahbad back in 16/17 century. i can go on and on with examples but the gist is that when your religion comes before your nation and you blatantly show that, then dont expect others to trust you especially as a group. The thing is u (to whomsoever it may concern) need to get ur head out of your arse and see things for real. How ironical to call the other post whatsapp forward while your (to whomsoever it may concern) reeks exactly like one. read the post replied to: https://np.reddit.com/indianews/comments/fwmbie/open_reply_to_post_in_rindiannews/
Last night, I came home at 9:30 and I turned on the TV to see what happened in my country today. And I was surprised to see how every TV channel was presenting the same program and how the preparations for Bhoomi Poojan to be held in Ayodhya on 5 August. Where will be the ritual will be performed, where will attendess sit? Let me remind you, of 120 people attending this event the Most Prominent names are as mentioned below. -Yogi Adityanath, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh - Rajnath Singh, Defence Minister - Amit Shah, Home Minister - PM Narendra Modi - Trustees of Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Tirtha Kshetra Trust - Many Prominent Figures who have helped that payed way to This fortunate day (name cannot be disclosed for security reasons, A®og¥a $€tu app $p¥|ng , #3lp.) And you know how the security agencies had issued an alert about how anti-India elements are planning to do something on the same day? It is Highly likely that they will target Bhoomi poojan based upon the people attending it. I don't understand how someone can be so stupid? Sharing sensitive information on television? It's similar to how Barka Dutt and Party reported during the attack of 26/11, Kargil war and recent scuffle between China and India. On 26/11, their live coverage led to more loss of life as these live feeds were used by the perpetrators, the mastermind sitting in pakistan, to inform the terrorist of the possible sites where people could be hiding and possible retaliation by Our Brave Armed forces. In Kargil war, Barkha carried an iridium satellite phone which could be tracked by enemy forces despite knowing it's consequences. More recently, at leh, amidst of border tension between expansionist China and Unyeilding India. Reporting on the activities of security forces to the last details which is best best to gathering a bunch of people with exceptional defence background and making their own version of War Room. War room. La Indian PM, HM, DM, CDS and Chief Commanders of three forces (Army, Air Force, Navy)
Insert meme * to main job Chod du? *
What will happen, if something like this happens and this information is used by anti-India elements to renact an atrocity? Who will be held responsible for helping them? Or it could be that Indian Media have better sources than IB and know about the actual plans of terrorists. Rant over but you should read the paragraph below as it is actually a news. PS: they should have covered the actual news like OpIndia is doing. A girl was threatened with rape, How authority is helping the Accused to get away with it(for last four months). Follow the Hindi Video & English article for more information.
Are the students of Jamia Millia Islamia really interested in secularism? Evidence points to the contrary.
Over the past week or so, we have seen violent protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) across many states. The one that was probably reported the most was the protest by Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) students. News channels like NDTV and India Today repeatedly reported how the police used excessive force against “peaceful” protesters. We were told that the students were opposed to the omission of Muslims from the CAA and sought to fight against it to “save” Indian democracy and “secularism”. While going through posts on social media, I came across an interesting piece of information - that JMI reserved 50% of its seats for Muslims. Not having too much faith in the accuracy of social media posts, I wanted to verify if this was really the case. Because if it were, it would clearly show that JMI was anything but secular. And so I started to go through their official websites: www.jmi.ac.in and www.jmicoe.in. What I learnt during my research astounded me. I knew that Muslim institutions gave preferential treatment to Muslims over non-Muslims but I never expected it to be this bad. My article relies solely on the documents and information available on these two official websites. No third parties, no hearsay. All the sources and links are listed at the end of this article. To begin with, the claim that 50% seats in JMI are reserved for Muslims is absolutely true. The following text has been taken from Page 30 of the 2018-19 prospectus of JMI. (as can be seen in the attached image) 5.1 (i) 30% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Muslim applicants. (ii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Women applicants who are Muslims. (iii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for “Other Backward Classes” (OBCs) and Scheduled Tribes who are Muslims. Note: If seats remain vacant in any program from amongst the 10% of the total number of seats earmarked as per 5.1 (ii) and (iii) above, such vacant seats shall stand transferred to the category 5.1(i),i.e., Muslim applicants. In other words, 30% seats for Muslim applicants + 10% for Muslim women + 10% for Muslim OBC. If there are any vacant seats from the Muslim women or Muslim OBC category, then those seats would be transferred to other Muslim applicants. So there would AT LEAST 50% seats for Muslims in JMI. Why do I say at least 50%? Well, apart from the 50% reservation for Muslims, there’s 5% reservation for Persons with Disabilities (or PwD). This reservation for PwDs is not limited Muslims only but since the selection of students would be done by the JMI staff, they could opt for Muslims over PwDs from other religions. And on top of that, there’s 5% reservation for “Internal (Jamia) students” i.e. students of Jamia who have passed their qualifying examination (X or XII) from Jamia Schools. And given that the same 50% reservation policy for Muslims exists in Jamia schools, the students from this category could all be Muslims. So on the whole, there could be up to a maximum of 60% Muslims from the reserved categories. But wait, it gets a lot worse!! There could be far more than 60% Muslims in a program / course. How? Because Muslims can also get admissions in the General category !!! In other words, 50% seats are reserved for Muslims only i.e. only Muslims can opt for these seats. Of the 5% reserved seats for PwDs, Muslims can be given preference. And 5% reservation for internal jamia students would almost certainly be all Muslims. On top of that, there would be Muslim applicants in the General category i.e. Muslims students who opt for admissions not via reservation but in the general category. So in the end, the percentage of Muslim students could be way more than 60%. To find out the exact proportion of Muslim students, one would require the list of all admissions in a particular program / course. I did find the list of all admissions for the year 2019-20 but since those lists display only the registration number of the students and not their name and religion, it cannot be used to determine the exact number of Muslim students. However I did find the list of graduated students for the year 2018. This list mentions the name of the candidates in addition to the registration number. Here’s what I found: a. In B.Tech Computer Engineering, 37 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 59%. b. In B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering, 40 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 64%. c. In B.Tech Mechanical Engineering, 43 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 66%. d. In B.Tech Civil Engineering, 51 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 78%. Assuming that the proportion of students in admission and graduation would be more-or-less the same, this data not only confirmed my suspicions that the percentage of Muslim students in various courses would be least 60% but went on to show that it may be as high as 80%. I analysed the data for these four streams of engineering. There are several other courses but I did not spend my time analysing each and every single one. For those who are interested to dig deeper, relevant links can be found at the end of this article. I then looked into scholarships i.e. what percentage of the total number of students who received scholarships were Muslims. Alumni Association of Jamia Millia Islamia (AAJMI) is tasked with providing scholarships for JMI students. I found the list of the selected candidates for the current year. In the first list, out of the 325 selected candidates, 303 are Muslims; which is 93% !! And in the second list, 96 out of the 99 candidates are Muslims i.e. 97%. In other words, of all the students who received scholarship in 2019, approximately 95% were Muslims. This data conclusively proves that an overwhelming majority of students at JMI are Muslims and that Muslims are given preferential treatment. I wondered if the same pattern holds true for the positions of deans and Heads of Department (HODs). And predictably enough, JMI does not disappoint !! Of the 37 heads of various departments, 32 are Muslim i.e. 86%. And when it comes to the Deans of faculties, 8 of the 9 are Muslim = 89% !! (Annual Report 2017-18) Finally, I went through the list of Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors of JMI. By now, I’m sure you can guess what I would have found. Of the 11 Chancellors since 1920, not one is a non-Muslim. And the same holds true for VCs. Not one of the 15 Vice Chancellors since 1920 is a non-Muslim. So in the end, 60-80% of the students, 95% of scholarship recipients, 86% of the HODs, approximately 90% of the Deans of faculties, and all the past & present Chancellors & Vice Chancellors of JMI are Muslims !! And yet, they claim to fight for "secularism" !!! Ask yourself these simple questions: 1. How serious can the students of such a university be about “secularism”? 2. Should we as a nation pay any heed to their demands given their shameless hypocrisy? 3. If they indeed were such strong believers in the idea of secularism then wouldn’t they start by secularising their own university first? 4. Do the students and professors of this university have a moral right to oppose ANY act on the grounds of secularism? For any unbiased reader, this article conclusively proves that the JMI is not interested in secularism in the least. Then why are they protesting CAA? In my opinion, the reasons are: 1. Supreme Court’s decision in favour of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. 2. Belief that Muslims must be loyal to fellow Muslims over the country i.e. Muslim Ummah (or Ummat). 3. Rightly / wrongly concluding that NRC will be bad. It is also very interesting how leftists / liberals and Muslims have learnt the subtle art of appropriating the Constitution to suit their own agenda. Everybody has heard the accusation that the CAA violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. One can find many Muslims, and non-Muslims, repeating the same crap. It is however very interesting that Muslims are demanding equality and cite Article 14 as the justification. Well, if they are so bent upon equality, then why don’t they accept the demand for Universal Civil Code (UCC)? NO!! You see, when the debate is about UCC, they quote Article 25 of the Constitution which gives the right to practice one’s own religion and claim various special privileges as a religious right; for eg. four wives, triple talaq, etc. And when the discussion pertains to giving citizenship to non-Muslim minorities from neighbouring Islamic countries, they jump to Article 14 !! In other words, they pick and choose that which suits them. So the next time you meet a leftist/liberal or Muslim who says that they oppose CAA because it goes against Article 14 and the principle of equal treatment, ask him if he supports Universal Civil Code. If he denies or gives you a lengthy nonsensical answer as to why he opposes UCC, then he stands exposed ; proving that he / she is not really interested in secularism. It is amazing that channels like NDTV who claim to present facts as they are have never seen fit to inform Indians about the vastly disproportionate number of Muslim students in JMI. Nor do they call out the hypocrisy of JMI “students”. If they would have, the whole country would have learnt that these protests have nothing to do with “secularism”. Now it is up to us to spread the word. Please share / forward this article so that the truth about JMI is known to everyone. (Original post by Rahul Arya, Right to Recall Party) Links: 1. JMI Prospectus for the year 2018-19 (see page 30): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/admission/prospectus2018.pdf 2. JMI Prospectus for the year 2019-20 (see page 29): http://jmicoe.in/pdf18/Prospectus\_2019-20-new.pdf 3. JMI schools prospectus for 2019-20 (see page 9): http://jmicoe.in.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf19/Final%20Prospectus%20JSSS-2019-20%20\_1\_.pdf 4. Annual convocation 2018: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/EventDetail/annualconvocation2019\_fet\_list\_2018.pdf 5. AAJMI scholarship: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/notice\_aajmi\_scholarship\_int\_2019february12.pdfhttps://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/scholarship\_aajmi\_fl2\_2019april17.pdf 6. JMI Annual Report 2017-18 (pages 13-15): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/menuupload/university\_annual\_report\_english\_2017\_2018.pdf 7. List of Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_chancellors\_profile-15 8. Lisf of Vice Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_vice\_chancellors\_profile-16
If you're looking for source of news, consider these.
The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted. Publishing information based on gossip about the line of investigation by the official agencies on the crime committed is not desirable. It is not advisable to vigorously report crime related issues on a day-to-day basis and comment on the evidence without ascertaining the factual matrix. Such reporting brings undue pressure in the course of fair investigation and trial
This is Press council of India lastest statement on the conduct of media on Sushant Singh Rajput case. It governs the conduct of the print. However, the News Broadcasting Standards Authority has been silent on the matter so far. As our media is looking at the other side and with so much happening around every single day, I reckon it will be good time to compile a list of news outlets which are maintaing the standards of journalism (in my opinion). There is no alternative to consume news than reading newspapers. And, there are many reputable ones such as The Indian Express, The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. If not, newsletters can be a good alternative. Newsletters
theNewsbury- This would provide you information about everything important in political, financial, business news that affect our daily lives. It would also provide you with a list of events which are scheduled to happen today and did you hear. In author's word, it is a quick 5 minute read of all the latest sh*t that’s happening in the world in a fun, easy to read and totally quotable lingo. It is being run by a team of female and will reach your email on Monday to Friday. Here.
Splainer- It has a similar format as Newsbury but paid as it goes a little deeper. It is for those who require context where all dots are connected to connect to understand the story better. Again, it is run by a team of females and they would provide you a little sanity break in form of short videos or something as consuming news can be heavy. It will arrive in your inbox on Monday to Friday. In author's word, you get the big picture, analysis and best reporting on that one big story everyone’s talking about. Catch up on key headlines, and discover a wealth of cool, funny, smart reads and videos from across the globe. There is zero jargon and no rants - and all of it's served with a generous dose of cheeky humour that makes you lol! My referral.
The third slip- This is a weekly newsletter which would provide you latest happenings of India and around the world. It is for those who has missed the news over the week and would like a little humour with it. In author's word, a newsletter that brings you all the major news of the week: The big, the trending, the stuff you missed, the bizzare. Just ten minutes every Sunday. With humour (conditions apply). So don't worry if you missed reading your paper one morning because your dog pooped on it. Or you didn't go through your Feedly because of a 287-slide PowerPoint you had to make. We've got it all here. Think of it as a combination of Quartz & The Bugle without the insight or quality of either. Here.
The Political Fix- It is twice a week newsletter on Indian politics and policy. It is being run by Rohan Venkataramakrishnan from Scroll. On Monday, you will get the big picture. On Friday, you will receive recommended reading list and an interview from an expert. Here.
Indialogue- This is a newsletter centered on the biggest policy development in India. It will provide you the developments and explanations of the policy which will be folled by a news round up and a reading list. It is being run by Aman Thakker who is J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Scholar at the University of Oxford, and Adjunct Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. And, you will receive this weekly. Here.
Finshots- This is one of the best and highly recommended newsletter. In author's word, it will provide you latest, most important Financial developments delivered in plain English. In less than 3 minutes. They have nice infographics. And, on Saturday, you will receive a newsletter talking about the markets. Just subscribe it
Podcast
3 things- This is the flagship podcast from Indian Express where hosts Shashank Bhargava and Arun George talk to in-house experts about what is going on and why you need to care about it Here.
Interpreting India- Every two weeks, they bring in voices from India and around the globe to unpack how technology, the economy, and foreign policy impact India’s relationship with the world. Interpreting India is a Carnegie India production hosted by Srinath Raghavan. Here
If you like longform perspectives and essays on politics and personalities then consider subscribing to the caravan. It has written on Justice Loya, Ayodhya, Kashmir and profiles on Narendra Modi, Ranjan Gogoi. If you like consuming news through Youtube then I recommend Soch and Faye D' Souza. The idea of the post is to make everyone informed so they make better decisions and arguments and support these journalists and agencies which are setting an example in their field. I have tried not to include those sources which have biases and included only those which stick with facts. It is possible that I might have yet included some. Please, let me know and I will edit the post. This isn't a complete list and I could have missed many quality source of news which are doing a great job. If so, comment down below and I will edit the post.
Are the students of Jamia Millia Islamia really interested in secularism? Evidence points to the contrary.
Over the past week or so, we have seen violent protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) across many states. The one that was probably reported the most was the protest by Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) students. News channels like NDTV and India Today repeatedly reported how the police used excessive force against “peaceful” protesters. We were told that the students were opposed to the omission of Muslims from the CAA and sought to fight against it to “save” Indian democracy and “secularism”. While going through posts on social media, I came across an interesting piece of information - that JMI reserved 50% of its seats for Muslims. Not having too much faith in the accuracy of social media posts, I wanted to verify if this was really the case. Because if it were, it would clearly show that JMI was anything but secular. And so I started to go through their official websites: www.jmi.ac.in and www.jmicoe.in. What I learnt during my research astounded me. I knew that Muslim institutions gave preferential treatment to Muslims over non-Muslims but I never expected it to be this bad. My article relies solely on the documents and information available on these two official websites. No third parties, no hearsay. All the sources and links are listed at the end of this article. To begin with, the claim that 50% seats in JMI are reserved for Muslims is absolutely true. The following text has been taken from Page 30 of the 2018-19 prospectus of JMI. (as can be seen in the attached image) 5.1 (i) 30% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Muslim applicants. (ii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Women applicants who are Muslims. (iii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for “Other Backward Classes” (OBCs) and Scheduled Tribes who are Muslims. Note: If seats remain vacant in any program from amongst the 10% of the total number of seats earmarked as per 5.1 (ii) and (iii) above, such vacant seats shall stand transferred to the category 5.1(i),i.e., Muslim applicants. In other words, 30% seats for Muslim applicants + 10% for Muslim women + 10% for Muslim OBC. If there are any vacant seats from the Muslim women or Muslim OBC category, then those seats would be transferred to other Muslim applicants. So there would AT LEAST 50% seats for Muslims in JMI. Why do I say at least 50%? Well, apart from the 50% reservation for Muslims, there’s 5% reservation for Persons with Disabilities (or PwD). This reservation for PwDs is not limited Muslims only but since the selection of students would be done by the JMI staff, they could opt for Muslims over PwDs from other religions. And on top of that, there’s 5% reservation for “Internal (Jamia) students” i.e. students of Jamia who have passed their qualifying examination (X or XII) from Jamia Schools. And given that the same 50% reservation policy for Muslims exists in Jamia schools, the students from this category could all be Muslims. So on the whole, there could be up to a maximum of 60% Muslims from the reserved categories. But wait, it gets a lot worse!! There could be far more than 60% Muslims in a program / course. How? Because Muslims can also get admissions in the General category !!! In other words, 50% seats are reserved for Muslims only i.e. only Muslims can opt for these seats. Of the 5% reserved seats for PwDs, Muslims can be given preference. And 5% reservation for internal jamia students would almost certainly be all Muslims. On top of that, there would be Muslim applicants in the General category i.e. Muslims students who opt for admissions not via reservation but in the general category. So in the end, the percentage of Muslim students could be way more than 60%. To find out the exact proportion of Muslim students, one would require the list of all admissions in a particular program / course. I did find the list of all admissions for the year 2019-20 but since those lists display only the registration number of the students and not their name and religion, it cannot be used to determine the exact number of Muslim students. However I did find the list of graduated students for the year 2018. This list mentions the name of the candidates in addition to the registration number. Here’s what I found: a. In B.Tech Computer Engineering, 37 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 59%. b. In B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering, 40 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 64%. c. In B.Tech Mechanical Engineering, 43 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 66%. d. In B.Tech Civil Engineering, 51 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 78%. Assuming that the proportion of students in admission and graduation would be more-or-less the same, this data not only confirmed my suspicions that the percentage of Muslim students in various courses would be least 60% but went on to show that it may be as high as 80%. I analysed the data for these four streams of engineering. There are several other courses but I did not spend my time analysing each and every single one. For those who are interested to dig deeper, relevant links can be found at the end of this article. I then looked into scholarships i.e. what percentage of the total number of students who received scholarships were Muslims. Alumni Association of Jamia Millia Islamia (AAJMI) is tasked with providing scholarships for JMI students. I found the list of the selected candidates for the current year. In the first list, out of the 325 selected candidates, 303 are Muslims; which is 93% !! And in the second list, 96 out of the 99 candidates are Muslims i.e. 97%. In other words, of all the students who received scholarship in 2019, approximately 95% were Muslims. This data conclusively proves that an overwhelming majority of students at JMI are Muslims and that Muslims are given preferential treatment. I wondered if the same pattern holds true for the positions of deans and Heads of Department (HODs). And predictably enough, JMI does not disappoint !! Of the 37 heads of various departments, 32 are Muslim i.e. 86%. And when it comes to the Deans of faculties, 8 of the 9 are Muslim = 89% !! (Annual Report 2017-18) Finally, I went through the list of Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors of JMI. By now, I’m sure you can guess what I would have found. Of the 11 Chancellors since 1920, not one is a non-Muslim. And the same holds true for VCs. Not one of the 15 Vice Chancellors since 1920 is a non-Muslim. So in the end, 60-80% of the students, 95% of scholarship recipients, 86% of the HODs, approximately 90% of the Deans of faculties, and all the past & present Chancellors & Vice Chancellors of JMI are Muslims !! And yet, they claim to fight for "secularism" !!! Ask yourself these simple questions: 1. How serious can the students of such a university be about “secularism”? 2. Should we as a nation pay any heed to their demands given their shameless hypocrisy? 3. If they indeed were such strong believers in the idea of secularism then wouldn’t they start by secularising their own university first? 4. Do the students and professors of this university have a moral right to oppose ANY act on the grounds of secularism? For any unbiased reader, this article conclusively proves that the JMI is not interested in secularism in the least. Then why are they protesting CAA? In my opinion, the reasons are: 1. Supreme Court’s decision in favour of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. 2. Belief that Muslims must be loyal to fellow Muslims over the country i.e. Muslim Ummah (or Ummat). 3. Rightly / wrongly concluding that NRC will be bad. It is also very interesting how leftists / liberals and Muslims have learnt the subtle art of appropriating the Constitution to suit their own agenda. Everybody has heard the accusation that the CAA violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. One can find many Muslims, and non-Muslims, repeating the same crap. It is however very interesting that Muslims are demanding equality and cite Article 14 as the justification. Well, if they are so bent upon equality, then why don’t they accept the demand for Universal Civil Code (UCC)? NO!! You see, when the debate is about UCC, they quote Article 25 of the Constitution which gives the right to practice one’s own religion and claim various special privileges as a religious right; for eg. four wives, triple talaq, etc. And when the discussion pertains to giving citizenship to non-Muslim minorities from neighbouring Islamic countries, they jump to Article 14 !! In other words, they pick and choose that which suits them. So the next time you meet a leftist/liberal or Muslim who says that they oppose CAA because it goes against Article 14 and the principle of equal treatment, ask him if he supports Universal Civil Code. If he denies or gives you a lengthy nonsensical answer as to why he opposes UCC, then he stands exposed ; proving that he / she is not really interested in secularism. It is amazing that channels like NDTV who claim to present facts as they are have never seen fit to inform Indians about the vastly disproportionate number of Muslim students in JMI. Nor do they call out the hypocrisy of JMI “students”. If they would have, the whole country would have learnt that these protests have nothing to do with “secularism”. Now it is up to us to spread the word. Please share / forward this article so that the truth about JMI is known to everyone. (Original post by Rahul Arya, Right to Recall Party) Links: 1. JMI Prospectus for the year 2018-19 (see page 30): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/admission/prospectus2018.pdf 2. JMI Prospectus for the year 2019-20 (see page 29): http://jmicoe.in/pdf18/Prospectus\_2019-20-new.pdf 3. JMI schools prospectus for 2019-20 (see page 9): http://jmicoe.in.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf19/Final%20Prospectus%20JSSS-2019-20%20\_1\_.pdf 4. Annual convocation 2018: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/EventDetail/annualconvocation2019\_fet\_list\_2018.pdf 5. AAJMI scholarship: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/notice\_aajmi\_scholarship\_int\_2019february12.pdfhttps://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/scholarship\_aajmi\_fl2\_2019april17.pdf 6. JMI Annual Report 2017-18 (pages 13-15): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/menuupload/university\_annual\_report\_english\_2017\_2018.pdf 7. List of Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_chancellors\_profile-15 8. Lisf of Vice Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_vice\_chancellors\_profile-16
Ayodhya :Find latest news, top stories on Ayodhya and get latest news updates. photos and videos on Ayodhya - ABP Live . TV Videos Podcasts. Search X. HOME PHOTOS VIDEOS LATEST NEWS INDIA ENTERTAINMENT WORLD IND VS AUS OTHERS. Gadgets Sports Education LIFESTYLE AUTO Business Health Personal Finance Bihar Election T20 League Bihar Exit Poll US ELECTIONS Pin Code Finder IFSC Code Finder Utility More review petitions in Ayodhya case: AIMPLB secy. Prime News, Nation, (Lucknow), December 6:-Six more litigants are set to file review petitions against the Supreme court verdict in… Read More » Murali 19/11/2019. 0 4 . Ayodhya verdict invokes doctrine of necessity. The Ayodhya judgment has reminded one of our judicial histories. On the Indian subcontinent, the judiciary has invoked Ayodhya Latest breaking news, pictures, photos and Video News. Find Ayodhya news headlines, photos, videos, comments, blog posts and opinion at The Indian Express. The Ram temple in Ayodhya will be built in around three years and the construction cost of the project will exceed Rs 1100 crore, the temple's Trust treasurer has said. Ayodhya News - Read Ayodhya latest News and Headlines today along with Ayodhya Photos and Videos at True Scoop News. Choose Language . EN: English HN: Hindi PN: Punjabi Covid-19 ; Breaking top news #ssrdeathmystery Ayodhya News :Find latest news, top stories on Ayodhya News and get latest news updates. photos and videos on Ayodhya News - ABP Ananda Ayodhya's Deepotsav celebrations, which bagged a place in the Guinness Book of Records, was depicted on one side of the tableau with earthen lamps, while other murals showed embracing of Nishadraj
Ayodhya Ram Mandir Case: Know What All Will Happen In SC Today ABP News
कट्टर हिंदुओं की भीड़ ने 6 दिसंबर, 1992 को अयोध्या में 16वीं सदी की बाबरी मस्जिद ... India's Supreme Court has ruled that the disputed holy site in Ayodhya in northern India should be given to Hindus who want to build a temple there.The case,... The hearing in The Supreme Court over the case pertaining to land dispute in Ayodhya is scheduled to begin at 11am today. The court is also likely to decide on 1st date of final hearing in the ... In the Indian town of Ayodhya, Muslims are feeling under siege as they wait for a Supreme Court ruling on a centuries-old religious dispute that has cast a s... The five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Saturday (November 9, 2019) ruled in favour of the Hindus in the over 70-year-old Ram Janmabhoomi-B... #RamMandirRumble #AyodhyaCase #NewsToday Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a ... Ayodhya Verdict Today: Security Beefed Up In Bengaluru, Mangaluru.., Download TV9 Kannada Android App: https://goo.gl/OM6nPA Subscribe to Tv9 Kannada: ht... Headlines today live Ayodhya Live News. Skip navigation Sign in Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Watch Ayodhya Story in 5 Minutes అప్పటి నుంచి ఏం జరిగింది ? Timeline Chronology TV5 News - Duration: 6:49. TV5 News 72,012 views 6:49